Gay Dad Life

Love and Family: Two All-American Dads

We are a world in desperate need of heroes. When I was a child, I looked to the skies. When I was a high schooler, I looked to comics. When I was in college, I looked to athletes. And now as a father, I look to people like Thomas and Jonathan West, every bit the heroes a world like ours needs.


At 34 and 33 years old, respectively, Thomas and Jonathan have not walked delicately through history, they have carved out their place with each step. But to get to 34 and 33, we have to turn the clock back a bit.

Jonathan was born in raised in Vermont, the youngest of four boys. Thomas is the oldest of five children, born in Florida. North and South, they grew up never expecting to find one another, nor having any clue of the life they would build together. Jon didn’t start thinking about his sexual orientation until early in college, as he had always dated girls. He identified as straight, and it wasn’t until heading into his junior year of college that he actually came out. He remembers feeling an incredible push of support from his friends, and that’s what made his coming-out a tremendous experience for him. His family was surprised initially, and needed some time to process it. Jonathan’s parents were immediately supportive, they wanted their boy to be happy and safe. Jonathan enrolled in the University of Vermont, graduating with a degree in Music Education.

Hundreds of miles away, Thomas was growing up with his family in Vero Beach, Florida. He had a great relationship with his parents who, along with the support of his friends, have supported him throughout his journey. Thomas went to Florida State University and graduated with a Bachelor’s in Political Science.

Jonathan had just graduated college, while Thomas was home in Florida, taking some time off from school in Vero Beach. Jonathan was offered a job there, and he started researching the place he would call home. They met online in September of 2005, and soon they found themselves talking on the phone every night; the connection was immediate. As soon as Jonathan moved to Florida, he and Thomas started spending time together in person. They were cut from the same cloth, with similar political interests, their personalities meshed, neither was into the partying or club scene. They were the couple who preferred to go for a quiet walk through a small town, or to hike together.

Jonathan holding Charlotte and Thomas on the right

A few months later, Thomas moved in with Jonathan. When Thomas was offered a job opportunity working on a gubernatorial campaign in Tampa, they moved together. They married in 2012, married by a local gay rabbi in Vermont. After having been engaged for almost two years, they were so grateful to marry their best friend. Here’s why that time period is fascinating for any student of history.

They married in October of 2012, and they pushed it because Thomas had joined the military. The Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) was still intact, so even though they had married legally, the state they were residing in did not have to confer the legal rights and benefits of marriage on them, nor did the military. They faced a large challenge with Thomas’ military work; he had been stationed in California for language training, and the military was treating him as a single solider, despite their then-8-year relationship and marriage, and they weren’t going to allow him to live off-base with his husband, the way any heterosexual married couple could. On Christmas of 2012, after they’d pushed for it, the military made the decision on its own to acquiesce, and to treat Thomas and Jonathan like the married couple they were, and they were permitted to reside off-base together. Despite having a marriage certificate, Thomas was still being paid at the single rate, and so the military’s acknowledgement of their marriage was a big deal. When DOMA was overturned, Thomas and Jonathan were the first in line to get their military IDs. Trails? Blazed.

Thomas and Jonathan have been together for almost eleven years now, and even before they were married, felt an incredible amount of support from their families; no one skipped a beat. They’ve also been very clear about their interest in building a family as well.

Recalling a night in 2013, Jonathan remembers it so vividly. “We went to a friend’s wedding, and were so moved by the family atmosphere that we sat on a bench overlooking the ocean and told each other that we were going to start building our family.” When they got back to California, they investigated how to move forward with becoming parents. They researched surrogacy, which quickly priced itself out as an option (as it does for so many, this author very much included). They started looking into private adoption. They had an agency do their home study in California, and started making phone calls for recommendations of agencies to work with for adoption. In California, they worked with a facilitator, created an adoption profile, and were put into the waiting pool. Their facilitator only worked with a few families at a time, and had a very expansive network; despite the connections, they were not matched while in California.

When Thomas finished his training, he and Jonathan moved to Fort Meade in Maryland. Two months after arriving, they were matched with a birth mom. Because their facilitator wasn’t licensed to operate in Maryland, they retained a lawyer who helped to smooth edges out to make it work for them. They were matched with a birth mom in Texas, not a very LGBT-friendly adoption state, who had agreed to a name with the Dads-to-be. A month before the adoption, their lawyer e-mailed them, informing them that the adoption could not move forward because the baby was going to be born with anencephaly. They were heartbroken. But heroes don’t quit, they don’t give in, they bend but they do not break. Thomas and Jonathan took a breath, and they started again.

A neighbor, now Executive Director of the LGBT Community Center in Baltimore, encouraged them to consider foster care. Thomas and Jonathan hadn’t put much thought into foster care, because of the high reunification rate with birth parents, and didn’t know if they’d have the strength to say goodbye to a child they had raised. As any great team does, they discussed their options, and went to a meeting, where they met a little boy named Noah. Noah had been with his foster Mom for 15 months, and his Mom said he was going to stay with her. Now in Baltimore, you can be certified as a foster-adoptive parent, meaning you are able to be certified for both. With 2,500-3,000 kids in foster care in Baltimore, and with the desire to become parents burning brightly in their hearts, Thomas and Jonathan decided to say “yes” to their next foster placement match.

In August of 2015, their phone rang. Anna (not her real name*) was four days old and had been taken into custody by the State. Our boys said yes to their girl, and she was at their house in an hour. They kept their vacation plans in Rehoboth shortly afterwards, and they met a 70-year old couple who were fascinated with Anna. On vacation, every dream they’d dreamed was realized when they heard someone say, “There’s Anna’s Dads”. Trail? Blazed.

Baltimore has a program called “While You Wait”, and it’s for families who are looking to adopt; the intent is that the program would present stories of children in foster care, seeking a forever home, and interested families who attended could potentially get a meeting to see if it was a good match. Thomas and Jonathan were hoping for an infant, and were told that it could take years. Five weeks after Anna (not her real name*) came home to them, at 10:00 on a Friday night with Jonathan zonked out on the couch, their phone rang again. It was the Deputy Director of Social Services for the City of Baltimore. She called because they were on a list of families interested in children who were available for adoption. Jon was immediately awake. And as hard work does, theirs paid off.

Charlotte had just been born. They packed up Anna and bolted out the door to a Catholic hospital that had never been in this scenario with two Dads. Charlotte was 4 hours old when they got there, Jon called his Mom and told her what was happening immediately; his parents feared it was news about Anna being reunified, but almost fell over when they told her the good news. Tom’s parents (Nana and Pops) were over the moon to learn with more certainty, that they were grandparents. And just like that, a family’s life changed twofold.

While there is always the chance of reunification with Anna’s birth parents, Thomas and Jonathan are working with an attorney to set up mediation, and they are hoping for an open adoption.

Thomas and Jonathan are so grateful for the ways in which their lives have changed, and recognize their responsibility to continue the work for others. They have an incredible resource in the American Military Partner Association (AMPA), that fights for families like theirs, Thomas and Jonathan were supported by AMPA in their struggle to achieve benefits under DOMA, they were even invited to bring their daughters to the White House last Christmas. Getting Charlotte on their military benefits was still a challenge, as there’s a separate set of rules to determine benefit eligibility, and there are still those in the chain of command who challenge those new rules, and challenge families like Thomas and Jonathan’s. Every superhero needs a good villain though, right?

On Saturday, June 11, Thomas and Jonathan, and Charlotte and Anna, took their radio flyer wagon to the streets of Washington, D.C. for Pride. As they marched, unprepared for what would transpire overnight in Orlando, the smiles and joy their girls brought to so many faces was immeasurable. The next morning, after hearing of the tragedy, they packed up their family and headed to Pennsylvania Avenue for Pridefest in Washington, D.C. They refused to be invisible. They refused to be afraid. They committed, as we all must, to love. To be visible. To be seen. To be.

They are every bit the men fighting the good fight, two tiny girls right behind them, pushing them forward, upward, beyond. They are North and South, black and white, boys and girls, banded together to continue to shine their light on all of us in our darkest of days and nights. And this author thinks that leadership like that is needed now more than ever, two Dads at a time. Because these days, heroes rarely wear capes, or drive amazing vehicles.

Sometimes it’s just an Army shirt, a pair of jeans, and a little red wagon. That’s what my heroes look like now.

Thomas (right) and Jonathan walk in the Washington, D.C. Pride parade, 2016

* Because Anna’s adoption hadn’t been finalized at the time of this article, the dads weren’t using her real name and could not show photos of her.

Show Comments ()
Gay Dad Life

Dads Tell Us Their 'Gayest Moment Ever' as Parents

We may be dads — but we're still gay, damnit! And these "gayest moments ever," sent to us from our Instagram community, prove it.

Did your child know all the lyrics to Madonna songs by age 3? Do your kids critique all the red carpet lewks from the Tony Awards? Do you often have baby food, diapers, sparkling white wine, gourmet appetizer, and fresh cut flowers in your shopping cart — all in one trip? If you answered 'yes' to any of the above, you just might be... a gay dad.

We asked the dads in our Instagram community to share their gayest moments as a dad, ever, and their responses were just as hilarious as they were relatable.

Here's a great way to start the week...

Keep reading...
Gay Dad Photo Essays

How Single Dads Are Celebrating Valentine's Day This Year

Valentine's Day is not just for lovers! We caught up with 8 single gay dads to see how they plan to celebrate Valentine's Day with this year.

Valentine's Day is not just for lovers; it's also a day to celebrate our loved ones. And that's exactly what these single dads are doing.

Within our community, GWK has a large group of admirable, active, and awesome (!) single dads and we want to honor them! On Valentine's Day, they and their kids celebrate their family unit in the sweetest possible ways. We asked the dads to share these moments with us, and, where possible, one of the most heartwarming things they've experienced with their kids on Valentine's Day to date.

Hear their stories below.

Keep reading...
Gay Dad Photo Essays

11 Gay Couples Share Secrets to Their Long-Term Relationships This Valentine's Day

This Valentine's Day, we spoke with 11 gay dad couples who've been together for almost a decade or longer to learn what's made their relationships last

You're the peanut butter to my jelly, the gin to my tonic, the strawberries to my cream, the Mr. to my Mr.!

Happy Valentine's Day folks! We're excited to celebrate this day of lurrrrvvve by featuring a few dads in our community who've been together for almost a decade or more! And they're ready to share their secrets to a successful relationship and parenting partnership.

Keep reading...
Politics

Supreme Court to Hear Major Case Concerning LGBTQ Foster Care Parents

The Supreme Court agreed to decide whether cities are allowed to exclude tax-funded adoption agencies from foster care systems if they refuse to work with gay couples.

In 2018, city officials in Philadelphia decided to exclude Catholic Social Services, which refuses to work with LGBTQ couples, from participating in its foster-care system. The agency sued, claiming religious discrimination, but the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit unanimously ruled against the agency, citing the need to comply with nondiscrimination policies.

The case, Fulton v. City of Philadelphia, follows a 2018 Supreme Court decision regarding a Colorado baker who refused to make a wedding cake for a same-sex couple. In that case, the court narrowly ruled that the baker bad been discriminated against, on religious grounds, by the state's civil rights commission. It did not decide the broader issue: whether an entity can be exempt from local non-discrimination ordinances on the basis of religious freedom.

The court — whose ideological center has shifted to the right since the addition of Justice Brett Kavanaugh in fall 2018 — may choose to do so now. Advocates quickly called on the court to consider the potential impact on the more than 400,000 children currently in the foster care system:

"We already have a severe shortage of foster families willing and able to open their hearts and homes to these children," said Leslie Cooper, deputy director of the ACLU LGBT & HIV Project. "Allowing foster care agencies to exclude qualified families based on religious requirements that have nothing to do with the ability to care for a child such as their sexual orientation or faith would make it even worse. We can't afford to have loving families turned away or deterred by the risk of discrimination."

"It is unconscionable to turn away prospective foster and adoptive families because they are LGBTQ, religious minorities, or for any other reason unrelated to their capacity to love and care for children," said HRC President Alphonso David. "We reject the suggestion that taxpayer-funded child welfare services should be allowed to put discrimination over a child's best interest. This case could also have implications for religious refusals that go far beyond child welfare. The Supreme Court must make it clear that freedom of religion does not include using taxpayer funds to further marginalize vulnerable communities."

The court may choose to override a 1990 decision, Employment Division v. Smith, which created the current standard for carving out religious exemptions. In that case, the court ruled that laws that target a specific faith, or express hostility towards certain beliefs, are unconstitutional — but this standard has long been abhorred by religious conservatives, who think it doesn't offer enough protections for religions. If the court does overrule Smith, it could have far-ranging consequences. " As noted on Slate, "it would allow anyone to demand a carve-out from laws that go against their religion, unless those laws are 'narrowly tailored' to serve a 'compelling government interest.'"

The four members of the court's conservative wing — Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch, and Kavanaugh —have all signaled an openness to reconsider Smith. The ruling's fate, then, likely rests in the hands of the court's new swing vote, Chief Justice Roberts.

For more, read the full article on Slate.

News

What's it Like to Be a Child of the 'Gayby Boom'?

Tosca Langbert, who grew up with two dads, writes a piece for the Harvard Business Review about what it's like being among the first children of the "Gayby Boom" to come of age.

We've previously written about the pressure on LGBTQ parents to appear perfect, given that so many in the United States still feel out families shouldn't exist in the first place. And we know this pressure trickles down to our kids. But In an article for the Harvard Business Review titled 'The Gayby Boom Is Here to Stay," author Tosca Langbert eloquently writes, from her perspective, about the experience of beingone of the first children to come of age during an era when LGBTQ parenthood is far more commonplace. She and her two siblings, she notes, "were raised in a family that was an impossibility only decades ago."

In the article, Langbert said she knew from a young age that her family was different from those of most of her peers, who had one a father and a mother. But otherwise, she writes, she didn't feel like her family differed much. "Like any other parents, Dad sat in the carpool lane after school and taught us how to ride our bikes," she writes, "while Papa took us to the movies on the weekends and separated the whites from the colors."

Keep reading...
Politics

Utah Bill Would Allow Gay Men to Enter Surrogacy Contracts

Rep. Patrice Arent of Utah is sponsoring a bill that will remove a provision that currently prohibits gay men from entering into commercial surrogacy contracts in the state.

Though Utah is not one of the three states that currently prohibit commercial surrogacy contracts, the state's current policy does specifically exclude gay men from doing so. That may soon changed, however, thanks to a bill in the state's legislature that was unanimously voted out of a House Committee that would remove that restriction.

The bill, sponsored by Rep. Patrice Arent, D-Millcreek, a Democrat, was created in response to a ruling by the Utah Supreme Court this past August that found the ban on gay men unconstitutional.

Gay men have been excluded from legally entering surrogacy contracts due to a provision in the current law that requires medical evidence "that the intended mother is unable to bear a child or is unable to do so without unreasonable risk to her physical or mental health or to the unborn child," Rep. Arent told the Salt Lake Tribune — a requirement that clearly excludes gay male couples.

The state's original surrogacy law dates back to 2005, before same-sex marriage was legalized in the state, which accounts for the gendered language. Though the state's Supreme Court already ruled the provision unconstitutional, Rep Arent further told the Tribute that, "People do not look to Supreme Court opinions to figure out the law, they look to the code and the code should be constitutional."

Politics

Colorado Republicans Try and Fail to Outlaw LGBTQ Marriage and Adoption Rights

A bill introduced by four Republican state legislators in Colorado that would outlaw same-sex marriage and adoption rights was voted down.

The "Colorado Natural Marriage and Adoption Act," which would have outlawed gay marriage and adoption in the state of Colorado, was voted down in the state legislature this week. The bill was sponsored by Republican Rep. Stephen Humphrey and three of his conservative colleagues: Dave Williams, Shane Sandridge and Mark Baisley.

If enacted, the bill would have enforced "state law that marriage is between one man and one woman" and restrict "adoption of children by spouses in a marriage ... that consist of one man and one woman."

The bill, which had little chance of success, particularly in Colorado which has trended more progressive over the past several election cycles, was mostly symbolic, according to Sanridrge. "We all know this bill isn't gonna pass in this current left-wing environment," he told Colorado Public Radio. "It's to remind everyone, this is the ultimate way to conceive a child."

In a sign of how far we've come on the issue of LGBTQ marriage and parenting rights, most Republican legislators in the state did not endorse the bill.

Though the bill had little chance of passage, LGBTQ advocacy groups in the state are taking the threats seriously nonetheless. Daniel Ramos, director of the LGBTQ group One Colorado, told LGBTQ Nation that the bills were an attempt to return Colorado to its "hate status" of the 1990s, adding the aggressiveness of the measures were "a bit surprising."

Fatherhood, the gay way

Get the latest from Gays With Kids delivered to your inbox!

Follow Gays With Kids

Powered by RebelMouse